Oximal to tyrosine residue Y730 in a depiction of the capsid

Oximal to tyrosine residue Y730 in a MedChemExpress 4EGI-1 depiction of the capsid surface amino acids (Fig. 7b). This residue, which sits in the depression at the icosahedral axis of the capsid, showed the highestLimits of Optimization of Recombinant AAV2 VectorsFigure 5. Analysis of intracellular trafficking of AAV multiple mutant MedChemExpress 842-07-9 vectors to the nucleus. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fraction of H2.35 cell infected with AAV2-WT, AAV2-Y444+500+730F and AAV2- Y444+500+730F+T491V mutant were separated and qPCR analysis was performed to evaluate vector genome distribution within cell in 16 h (a) and 48 h (b) post infection. **P,0.001 vs. WT in nucleus was considered as significant. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059142.gincrease in transduction compared to WT AAV2 when of the seven surface-exposed tyrosines where mutated to phenylanine residues [13]. Significantly, the two-fold capsid region is observed to undergo pH-mediated structural transitions when the homologous AAV8 was examined at the conditions encountered during trafficking in the endocytic pathway [46]. Thus while the exact underlying molecular basis for the observed improvement in transduction for the T491V, and quadruple mutant (Y444+500+730F+T491V) are not immediately apparent, the proximal location of T491 and Y730 supports a role for the icosahedral two-fold axis in AAV cellular trafficking, including modifications that likely target the capsid for degradation in the proteasome. These results highlight a need for additional studies to delineate the role each of the critical Y, S, and T residues in various steps in the life cycle of AAV vectors. For example, it is possible that the mutations of the AAV2 could be improving transduction efficiency through altered receptor binding mechanisms. Residues mediating AAV2 and AAV6 interaction with heparan sulfate receptors, R585 and R588, and K531 (structurally equivalent to E530 in AAV2), respectively, are close to this foot (Fig. 7b), and residues 491 and 500, in VRV, are located in one of two large regions on the surface of the AAV2 capsid that has been implicated in binding to the LamR receptor in AAV8 [47]. Amino acids in VRV also play a role in the AAV9 capsid binding to its glycan receptor, galactose.The decreased transduction efficiency phenotype of the mutants containing the S662V mutations is difficult to explain given the location of this residue within the footprint delineated by the residues which enhance transduction when mutated to eliminate potential phosphorylation (Fig. 7a and b). In addition, it was previously shown that a mutation of this residue to valine improved transduction relative to WT AAV2 [12]. Residue S662, like T659, is located in the 18204824 HI loop which extends over adjacent five-fold symmetry related VP3 monomers and likely plays a role in stabilizing the pentameric subunits. However the serine side-chain is not engaged in any inter- or intra-subunit interactions, and while the HI loop has been reported to be a determinant of capsid assembly and genome packaging [41], it tolerated single amino acid substitution [12]. Thus its effect is likely due to the abrogation of a capsid interaction utilizing the footprint containing the triple-tyrosine mutant residues and T491. Significantly, the phenotypes for mutations in nearby amino acids that make up the HI loop, for example, amino acid residue 664, substituting either serine (mut45subSer14) or a FLAG epitope (mut45SubFLAG10), were non-infectious or not assembled into viral capsid [48]. However.Oximal to tyrosine residue Y730 in a depiction of the capsid surface amino acids (Fig. 7b). This residue, which sits in the depression at the icosahedral axis of the capsid, showed the highestLimits of Optimization of Recombinant AAV2 VectorsFigure 5. Analysis of intracellular trafficking of AAV multiple mutant vectors to the nucleus. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fraction of H2.35 cell infected with AAV2-WT, AAV2-Y444+500+730F and AAV2- Y444+500+730F+T491V mutant were separated and qPCR analysis was performed to evaluate vector genome distribution within cell in 16 h (a) and 48 h (b) post infection. **P,0.001 vs. WT in nucleus was considered as significant. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059142.gincrease in transduction compared to WT AAV2 when of the seven surface-exposed tyrosines where mutated to phenylanine residues [13]. Significantly, the two-fold capsid region is observed to undergo pH-mediated structural transitions when the homologous AAV8 was examined at the conditions encountered during trafficking in the endocytic pathway [46]. Thus while the exact underlying molecular basis for the observed improvement in transduction for the T491V, and quadruple mutant (Y444+500+730F+T491V) are not immediately apparent, the proximal location of T491 and Y730 supports a role for the icosahedral two-fold axis in AAV cellular trafficking, including modifications that likely target the capsid for degradation in the proteasome. These results highlight a need for additional studies to delineate the role each of the critical Y, S, and T residues in various steps in the life cycle of AAV vectors. For example, it is possible that the mutations of the AAV2 could be improving transduction efficiency through altered receptor binding mechanisms. Residues mediating AAV2 and AAV6 interaction with heparan sulfate receptors, R585 and R588, and K531 (structurally equivalent to E530 in AAV2), respectively, are close to this foot (Fig. 7b), and residues 491 and 500, in VRV, are located in one of two large regions on the surface of the AAV2 capsid that has been implicated in binding to the LamR receptor in AAV8 [47]. Amino acids in VRV also play a role in the AAV9 capsid binding to its glycan receptor, galactose.The decreased transduction efficiency phenotype of the mutants containing the S662V mutations is difficult to explain given the location of this residue within the footprint delineated by the residues which enhance transduction when mutated to eliminate potential phosphorylation (Fig. 7a and b). In addition, it was previously shown that a mutation of this residue to valine improved transduction relative to WT AAV2 [12]. Residue S662, like T659, is located in the 18204824 HI loop which extends over adjacent five-fold symmetry related VP3 monomers and likely plays a role in stabilizing the pentameric subunits. However the serine side-chain is not engaged in any inter- or intra-subunit interactions, and while the HI loop has been reported to be a determinant of capsid assembly and genome packaging [41], it tolerated single amino acid substitution [12]. Thus its effect is likely due to the abrogation of a capsid interaction utilizing the footprint containing the triple-tyrosine mutant residues and T491. Significantly, the phenotypes for mutations in nearby amino acids that make up the HI loop, for example, amino acid residue 664, substituting either serine (mut45subSer14) or a FLAG epitope (mut45SubFLAG10), were non-infectious or not assembled into viral capsid [48]. However.

Leave a Reply