Growing season RP101988 Description vegetation greenness was positively correlated with all the increasing season precipitation,season vegetation greennessthe developing season temIn common, the growing and negatively correlated with was positively correlated with perature and vapor pressure deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation in the growing season precipitation, and negatively correlated with the expanding season the two high-elevation stations correlate small with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, temperature and vapor pressure deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation suggesting that elements other than temperature and moisture handle interannual vegetaat the two high-elevation stations correlate little with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, tion dynamics there. suggesting that factorsair temperature was negativelymoisture handle interannual vegetation The developing season other than temperature and correlated together with the growing seadynamics there. son vegetation greenness, plus the correlation coefficients were statistically insignificant exceptThe developing on grassland. This suggestswas negatively correlatedvegetation growing at one station season air temperature that warming did not drive using the season vegetation greenness, and this region, and coefficients have been statistically insignificant growth in the interannual time scale inthe correlation inversely, vegetation development may possibly have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) that warming didn’t drive vegetation Combretastatin A-1 manufacturer except at one station on grassland. This suggests using the enhanced evapotranspiration in the interannual time scale within this area, and inversely, vegetation growth might development in the vegetation green-up. Additionally, the magnitudes with the correlation amongst temperature and vegetation greenness have been commonly significantly smaller sized than these on the correlation amongst humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics in this region may be driven by soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is connected to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.4.4. Interannual Covariation among the Vegetation Greenness and Climatic FactorsRemote Sens. 2021, 13,ten ofRemote Sens. 2021, 13,have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) with all the enhanced evapotranspiration from the vegetation green-up. Also, the magnitudes from the correlation between temperature and vegetation greenness have been typically significantly smaller sized than those in the correlation amongst humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics within this region may possibly be driven by 11 of 20 soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is related to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.Figure 7. Correlation coefficients between the detrended developing season NDVI along with the detrended Figure 7. Correlation coefficients between the detrended developing season NDVI plus the detrended developing season temperature, precipitation, at the same time as atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increasing season temperature, precipitation, also as atmospheric vapor stress deficit (VPD) at at the meteorological stations inside the the period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI meteorological station the nine nine meteorological stations in period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI at aat a me.
