Used manual volumetry and VBM to characterise differences CY5-SE site between WT and R6/2 mice [20,21]. A novel aspect of that work was the use of segmented grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) in the mouse brain, an approach that is not widely used outside the human brain, despite its success in patients and healthy controls. The most common alternative approach to automated analysis involves ignoring the images once they have been registered to a common atlas and instead performing statistical tests on the registration parameters (tensoror deformation-based morphometry, see e.g. [26,27]). Retaining some image intensity information in the form of GM maps allows greater scope for chemical changes that are not associated with volume changes to be observed. Using measures of shape change to compare brains, such as the Jacobian determinant of transformation fields, will reveal only microstructural changes when these cause the registration model to geometrically warp the brain to `correct’ the differences in signal as a geometric change rather than one in chemical environment. This is particularly relevant here, as we have shown that not only are there size differences in key brain regions of the R6/2 mouse, but also signal intensity changes [21]. We are releasing these datasets to the neuroscience community to facilitate research into structural differences seen in mice and to provide common 26001275 datasets that can be used for advancing methodological techniques of automated assessment of structural phenotypes. We are also releasing online the structural data, segmented GM and WM tissue maps for each brain, as well as population-average templates that can be used for VBM investigations [27]. To show how these data might be used, here we present sample results from automated whole brain volume assessment across ages in WT mice and sub-strains of R6/2 mice with differing cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat lengths, as well as brains from YAC128 and complexin 1 knockout (Cplx1 KO) mice. In addition, we present maps showing the cortical thickness variation between strains. All of the datasets are available via DSpace, the Institutional Repository of the University of Cambridge (permanent link: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/ handle/1810/243361). Once lodged, files will remain accessible MedChemExpress CP-868596 indefinitely. As well as the images, metadata describing the age, sex, and other relevant model details (e.g. for R6/2 mice the CAG expansion length) will be included. In addition to the image data, we have provided templates and open-source extension software (SPMMouse; http://www.spmmouse.com) permitting the analysis of these and other animal brains in the popular SPM package that is widely used throughout the neuroimaging community (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, UK). We are continuing to acquire images, in particular from longitudinal scans acquired in vivo. These will be added to our open-access library ad hoc as they become available. All of the datasets presented here were acquired post mortem either as an intact head or following skull extraction as described in the methods section.genotype groups of 10. All of the mice lived in an enhanced environment with increased amounts of bedding and nestling materials. Clean cages were provided twice weekly, with grade 8/ 10-corncob bedding, and finely shredded paper for nesting. Genotyping was performed using PCR from tail snips taken at 3 weeks and CAG repeat lengths were measured by Laragen.Used manual volumetry and VBM to characterise differences between WT and R6/2 mice [20,21]. A novel aspect of that work was the use of segmented grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) in the mouse brain, an approach that is not widely used outside the human brain, despite its success in patients and healthy controls. The most common alternative approach to automated analysis involves ignoring the images once they have been registered to a common atlas and instead performing statistical tests on the registration parameters (tensoror deformation-based morphometry, see e.g. [26,27]). Retaining some image intensity information in the form of GM maps allows greater scope for chemical changes that are not associated with volume changes to be observed. Using measures of shape change to compare brains, such as the Jacobian determinant of transformation fields, will reveal only microstructural changes when these cause the registration model to geometrically warp the brain to `correct’ the differences in signal as a geometric change rather than one in chemical environment. This is particularly relevant here, as we have shown that not only are there size differences in key brain regions of the R6/2 mouse, but also signal intensity changes [21]. We are releasing these datasets to the neuroscience community to facilitate research into structural differences seen in mice and to provide common 26001275 datasets that can be used for advancing methodological techniques of automated assessment of structural phenotypes. We are also releasing online the structural data, segmented GM and WM tissue maps for each brain, as well as population-average templates that can be used for VBM investigations [27]. To show how these data might be used, here we present sample results from automated whole brain volume assessment across ages in WT mice and sub-strains of R6/2 mice with differing cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat lengths, as well as brains from YAC128 and complexin 1 knockout (Cplx1 KO) mice. In addition, we present maps showing the cortical thickness variation between strains. All of the datasets are available via DSpace, the Institutional Repository of the University of Cambridge (permanent link: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/ handle/1810/243361). Once lodged, files will remain accessible indefinitely. As well as the images, metadata describing the age, sex, and other relevant model details (e.g. for R6/2 mice the CAG expansion length) will be included. In addition to the image data, we have provided templates and open-source extension software (SPMMouse; http://www.spmmouse.com) permitting the analysis of these and other animal brains in the popular SPM package that is widely used throughout the neuroimaging community (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, UK). We are continuing to acquire images, in particular from longitudinal scans acquired in vivo. These will be added to our open-access library ad hoc as they become available. All of the datasets presented here were acquired post mortem either as an intact head or following skull extraction as described in the methods section.genotype groups of 10. All of the mice lived in an enhanced environment with increased amounts of bedding and nestling materials. Clean cages were provided twice weekly, with grade 8/ 10-corncob bedding, and finely shredded paper for nesting. Genotyping was performed using PCR from tail snips taken at 3 weeks and CAG repeat lengths were measured by Laragen.
