Ability to integrate world knowledge within a specific context or situation. Our KF-89617 cost findings are in contrast to previous studies reporting no ASD-related difficulties in making physical inferences in participants with ASD ages 8 to 45 years (Happ?1994) and participants with Asperger syndrome ages 10 to 20 years (Kaland et al. 2005). However, in both of those studies, the physical scenarios were used either as a screening tool (Happ?1994) or to check for possible comprehension deficits (Kaland et al., 2005). The physical stories in the Happ?study were relatively easy with all the participants (those both with and without ASD) reported as performing at ceiling. Kaland and colleagues used lengthy stories with greater detail, which may have provided the cues necessary to ascertain correct physical inferences. The current findings endorse the importance of using both social and non-social information when assessing the drawing of inferences in individuals with ASD. The correlation of the performance on the PIT and the TLC-E suggests that the PIT was measuring similar skills as measured by this standardized test of metalinguistic abilities. However, the PIT had the added element of measuring inferencing about physical events that was not provided by the standardized measure. Therefore, the PIT provides a more complete picture of the inferencing abilities of individuals with ASD than provided by previous investigations that have used only this standardized measure (Dennis et al. 2001; Lewis et al. 2007; Minshew et al. 1995). Adults with ASD displayed a marked relationship between the PIT and Adult version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes, especially for emotion-related inferences. The relationships between the Adult Version of the Mind in the Eyes and the remaining PIT subscales (otherToM and physical inference) were dramatically smaller. Therefore, the PIT is a sensitive enough measure to tease apart deficits in emotion vs. other inference-making abilities noted in individuals with ASD. Of note, and somewhat unexpectedly, the correlations between the PIT and Child Version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task were observed to be smallAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Autism Dev Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Bodner et al.Pagein magnitude. However, upon further review, these findings might be explained by the development of more Abamectin B1a biological activity complex inference-making abilities over time in this group. The results of the current study suggest that difficulty in drawing an inference in and of itself is not a specific cognitive impairment that is characteristic of ASD. Although the group with ASD was relatively more impaired with making inferences than the group with typical development, participants with ASD were able to make inferences about physical and mental states especially with increases in language ability and/or age. Difficulty in making inferences may be reflective of a more generalized underlying difficulty with information processing mechanisms consistent with a complex information processing model of ASD (Minshew et al. 1997; Williams et al. 2006). That is, as suggested by the results of the Mason and colleagues (2008) fMRI study of bridging inferences in ASD, the individuals with ASD may be accomplishing the process of drawing an inference with a more inefficient neural network than that of the age and ability-matched controls with typical development, relying more heavily.Ability to integrate world knowledge within a specific context or situation. Our findings are in contrast to previous studies reporting no ASD-related difficulties in making physical inferences in participants with ASD ages 8 to 45 years (Happ?1994) and participants with Asperger syndrome ages 10 to 20 years (Kaland et al. 2005). However, in both of those studies, the physical scenarios were used either as a screening tool (Happ?1994) or to check for possible comprehension deficits (Kaland et al., 2005). The physical stories in the Happ?study were relatively easy with all the participants (those both with and without ASD) reported as performing at ceiling. Kaland and colleagues used lengthy stories with greater detail, which may have provided the cues necessary to ascertain correct physical inferences. The current findings endorse the importance of using both social and non-social information when assessing the drawing of inferences in individuals with ASD. The correlation of the performance on the PIT and the TLC-E suggests that the PIT was measuring similar skills as measured by this standardized test of metalinguistic abilities. However, the PIT had the added element of measuring inferencing about physical events that was not provided by the standardized measure. Therefore, the PIT provides a more complete picture of the inferencing abilities of individuals with ASD than provided by previous investigations that have used only this standardized measure (Dennis et al. 2001; Lewis et al. 2007; Minshew et al. 1995). Adults with ASD displayed a marked relationship between the PIT and Adult version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes, especially for emotion-related inferences. The relationships between the Adult Version of the Mind in the Eyes and the remaining PIT subscales (otherToM and physical inference) were dramatically smaller. Therefore, the PIT is a sensitive enough measure to tease apart deficits in emotion vs. other inference-making abilities noted in individuals with ASD. Of note, and somewhat unexpectedly, the correlations between the PIT and Child Version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task were observed to be smallAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptJ Autism Dev Disord. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 September 01.Bodner et al.Pagein magnitude. However, upon further review, these findings might be explained by the development of more complex inference-making abilities over time in this group. The results of the current study suggest that difficulty in drawing an inference in and of itself is not a specific cognitive impairment that is characteristic of ASD. Although the group with ASD was relatively more impaired with making inferences than the group with typical development, participants with ASD were able to make inferences about physical and mental states especially with increases in language ability and/or age. Difficulty in making inferences may be reflective of a more generalized underlying difficulty with information processing mechanisms consistent with a complex information processing model of ASD (Minshew et al. 1997; Williams et al. 2006). That is, as suggested by the results of the Mason and colleagues (2008) fMRI study of bridging inferences in ASD, the individuals with ASD may be accomplishing the process of drawing an inference with a more inefficient neural network than that of the age and ability-matched controls with typical development, relying more heavily.
