E major gaps in knowledge about sex. These gaps are not addressed in the existing initiatives (anti-AIDS clubs and biology classes). Furthermore, even though condoms should be freely available in health centres, young people still report a great need for condoms and many recommend distribution in the school. Second, interventions should focus on the two main sexual interactions respondents described, namely experimental and transactional sex. Third, risky sexual decision-making is influenced by many factors ?the social trajectory, the social context and the interaction ?and therefore SRH promotion interventions that are not related to all three aspects may be less effective. Finally, the mailbox Flagecidin manufacturer method appears to be a cost-effective means of collecting information on young people’s thoughts on sexuality and prevention methods.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
Mozambique has a national human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rate among adults 15 ?49 years of 11.1 (UNAIDS 2013). This translates into an estimated 1.6 million HIV-infected Mozambicans, with more than 120,000 new infections occurring annually (UNAIDS 2013). The national response to the HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has been substantial and treatment services are now available in every district in the country. However, despite Mozambique’s best efforts, only 38 of those eligible, approximately 233,000 people, are currently receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) (National Institute of Statistics 2011). The HIV epidemic continues to increase in Mozambique, particularly in the southern part of the country where the HIV rate is as high ?as 25.1 (Instituto Nacional de Saude, Instituto Nacional de Esta?tistica ICF Macro 2009). Continued support is needed to maintain recent achievements and expand and improve HIV-related services. One evidence-based approach to HIV prevention is to focus prevention efforts with people living with HIV and AIDS (PLHIV) who know their serostatus. Known variously as prevention with positives, positive health, dignity, and prevention, or as commonly referred to in Mozambique, positive prevention (PP), these approaches are crucial for addressing transmission of HIV (Bunnell, Mermin De Cock 2006; Kennedy, Medley, Sweat O’Reilly 2010). Policy directives include PP as a cornerstone of HIV prevention efforts (CDC 2003; Kennedy et al. 2010). Evidence suggests that PP interventions addressing the prevention needs of PLHIV in developing countries increase the use of condoms, help keep PLHIV healthy, and prevent onward transmission while increasing PLHIV involvement in prevention efforts (Bunnell, Mermin, et al. 2006; World Health Organization 2007). In the USA, PP interventions have been found to be feasible, acceptable and effective at reducing sexual behaviors that transmit HIV (Fisher, Fisher, Cornman, Amico, Bryan Friedland 2006; Richardson, Milam, McCutchan, Stoyanoff, Bolan, Weiss, et al. 2004; Thrun, Cook, Bradley-Springer, Gardner, Marks, Wright,et al. 2009). Although the PP literature from Africa is more limited, various studies have found PP interventions to be effective at either increasing condom use or leading to a reduction in risky sexual behaviors (Bunnell, Ekwaru, order ALS-008176 Solberg, Wamai, Bikaako-Kajura, Were, et al. 2006; Kennedy et al. 2010). Fewer studies in Africa have questioned whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible to implement. A study conducte.E major gaps in knowledge about sex. These gaps are not addressed in the existing initiatives (anti-AIDS clubs and biology classes). Furthermore, even though condoms should be freely available in health centres, young people still report a great need for condoms and many recommend distribution in the school. Second, interventions should focus on the two main sexual interactions respondents described, namely experimental and transactional sex. Third, risky sexual decision-making is influenced by many factors ?the social trajectory, the social context and the interaction ?and therefore SRH promotion interventions that are not related to all three aspects may be less effective. Finally, the mailbox method appears to be a cost-effective means of collecting information on young people’s thoughts on sexuality and prevention methods.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
Mozambique has a national human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rate among adults 15 ?49 years of 11.1 (UNAIDS 2013). This translates into an estimated 1.6 million HIV-infected Mozambicans, with more than 120,000 new infections occurring annually (UNAIDS 2013). The national response to the HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has been substantial and treatment services are now available in every district in the country. However, despite Mozambique’s best efforts, only 38 of those eligible, approximately 233,000 people, are currently receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) (National Institute of Statistics 2011). The HIV epidemic continues to increase in Mozambique, particularly in the southern part of the country where the HIV rate is as high ?as 25.1 (Instituto Nacional de Saude, Instituto Nacional de Esta?tistica ICF Macro 2009). Continued support is needed to maintain recent achievements and expand and improve HIV-related services. One evidence-based approach to HIV prevention is to focus prevention efforts with people living with HIV and AIDS (PLHIV) who know their serostatus. Known variously as prevention with positives, positive health, dignity, and prevention, or as commonly referred to in Mozambique, positive prevention (PP), these approaches are crucial for addressing transmission of HIV (Bunnell, Mermin De Cock 2006; Kennedy, Medley, Sweat O’Reilly 2010). Policy directives include PP as a cornerstone of HIV prevention efforts (CDC 2003; Kennedy et al. 2010). Evidence suggests that PP interventions addressing the prevention needs of PLHIV in developing countries increase the use of condoms, help keep PLHIV healthy, and prevent onward transmission while increasing PLHIV involvement in prevention efforts (Bunnell, Mermin, et al. 2006; World Health Organization 2007). In the USA, PP interventions have been found to be feasible, acceptable and effective at reducing sexual behaviors that transmit HIV (Fisher, Fisher, Cornman, Amico, Bryan Friedland 2006; Richardson, Milam, McCutchan, Stoyanoff, Bolan, Weiss, et al. 2004; Thrun, Cook, Bradley-Springer, Gardner, Marks, Wright,et al. 2009). Although the PP literature from Africa is more limited, various studies have found PP interventions to be effective at either increasing condom use or leading to a reduction in risky sexual behaviors (Bunnell, Ekwaru, Solberg, Wamai, Bikaako-Kajura, Were, et al. 2006; Kennedy et al. 2010). Fewer studies in Africa have questioned whether PP interventions are acceptable and feasible to implement. A study conducte.
