Le computation offered an identical boundary or really similar boundary situations. boundary situations.HNMPA Insulin Receptor Figure 6. Windowed simulation comparison with the radiative Monobenzone Protocol intensity along the Z lines (X (X0.five,0.5, simulation comparison from the radiative intensity along the Z lines = = Y Figure six. Figure six. Windowed simulationfor RT-LBM, of our MC model, along with the MC modellines (X =fromY et al. al. (2020). = 0.5, 0.75, 0.88) comparison our MC model, plus the along the (MCM) from Mink Y = 0.5, 0.75, 0.88) for RT-LBM, the radiative intensityMC modelZ (MCM) 0.5, Mink et (2020). = 0.five, 0.75, 0.88)The RT-LBM, our MC model, aa= 0.9, bb= two. model (MCM) from Mink et al. (2020). for radiative parameters are = the = two. Theradiative parameters are and0.9, MC The radiative parameters are a = 0.9, b = two.Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1316 Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER Overview Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW9 of 14 9 of of 15 9Figure 7. Various window size effects the direct solar radiation intensity. The top rated row are Figure 7. 7. Distinctive window size effects around the direct solar radiation intensity. The leading row are from Figure Different window size effects onon the direct solar radiation intensity. The prime row are RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row are are from model simulations. The The radiative paramfrom RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row from MC MC model simulations. radiative parameters are from RT-LBM simulations. The bottom row are from MC model simulations. The radiative parama = 0.five, 0.1. eters are ab==0.5, b = 0.1. eters are a = 0.5, b = 0.1.Figure 8. 8. Oblique incoming solar direct beam radiation simulation case. Comparisonof with the radiaFigure Oblique incoming solar direct beam radiation simulation case. Comparison ofthe radiadirect beam radiation simulation case. Comparison the radiative Figure 8. Oblique tive intensity at at cross section at Y = 0.5.=forfor RT-LBM and also the MC model. The radiative parametive intensity X-Z cross section at at = 0.5. RT-LBM plus the MC model. The radiative parameters are intensity at X-Z X-Z cross section Y Y 0.five. for RT-LBM and also the MC model. The radiative parameters = 0.5, = 0.five, b = 0.1. ters are b = 0.1. b = 0.1. a are a a = 0.5,Yet another circumstance, ofof solar direct beam radiation oblique towards the level ground surface, Another situation, of solar direct beam radiation oblique to the level ground surface, An additional scenario, solar direct beam radiation oblique for the level ground surface, is is simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of clean air (a (a = 0.five, = = 0.1) situation simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of a is simulated. The atmospheric optical parameters of a clean air = 0.five, b b 0.1) predicament have been used. The motivation for this simulation was toto look into whether or not direct solar radialook into whether direct solar radiwere utilised. The motivation for this simulation was to appear into no matter if direct solar radiation decreases when the solar ray isis not perpendicular towards the top boundary surface. The ationdecreases when the solar ray is not perpendicular towards the top boundary surface. decreases when the solar ray not perpendicular to the best boundary surface. The tion incoming solar zenith angle was set toto 45from the west and also the incoming direct solar incoming solar zenith angle was set to 45from the west and the incoming direct solar incoming solar zenith angle was set 45 from radiative intensity was set toto 1. The RT-LBM and MC simulations examine reasonably radiative intensity was set to one particular. The RT-L.
